The impact of high-frequency magnetic stimulation of peripheral nerves: Muscle hardness, venous blood flow, and motor function of upper extremity in healthy subjects

14Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of high-frequency peripheral nerve magnetic stimulation on the upper limb function. Twenty-five healthy adults (16 men and 9 women) participated in this study. The radial nerve of the non-dominant hand was stimulated by high-frequency magnetic stimulation device. A total of 600 impulses were applied at a frequency of 20 Hz and intensity of 1.2 resting motor threshold (rMT). At three time points (before, immediately after, and 15 min after stimulation), muscle hardness of the extensor digitorum muscle on the stimulated side was measured using a mechanical tissue hardness meter and a shear wave imaging device, cephalic venous blood flow on the stimulated side was measured using an ultrasound system, and the Box and Block test (BBT) was performed. Mechanical tissue hardness results did not show any significant differences between before, immediately after, and 15 min after stimulation. Measurements via shear wave imaging showed that muscle hardness significantly decreased both immediately and 15 min after stimulation compared to before stimulation (P < 0.05). Peripheral venous blood flow and BBT score significantly increased both immediately and 15 min after stimulation compared to before stimulation (P < 0.01). High-frequency peripheral nerve magnetic stimulation can achieve effects similar to electrical stimulation in a less invasive manner, and may therefore become an important element in next-generation rehabilitation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Okudera, Y., Matsunaga, T., Sato, M., Chida, S., Hatakeyama, K., Watanabe, M., & Shimada, Y. (2015). The impact of high-frequency magnetic stimulation of peripheral nerves: Muscle hardness, venous blood flow, and motor function of upper extremity in healthy subjects. Biomedical Research (Japan), 36(2), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.2220/biomedres.36.81

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free