Scientific Progress

2Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We deal with the problem of verisimilitude, a notion which, roughly speaking, tries to capture how close a scientific theory is to the truth. Our starting philosophical basis is Evandro Agazzi’s approach and his view on scientific objectivity which relies on his particular meaning of ”partial truth’. By following an epistemological approach to the verisimilitude problem and adopting the semantic view of theories, we develop our epistemological proposal about the comparative evaluation of scientific theories and cognitive situations. Our proposal allows to establish, in a qualitative way, in which sense a theory, or a cognitive situation, is better (more verisimilar) than another.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fano, V., & Macchia, G. (2015). Scientific Progress. In Science Between Truth and Ethical Responsibility: Evandro Agazzi in the Contemporary Scientific and Philosophical Debate (pp. 65–78). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16369-7_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free