Efficacy of Nanosilica Coatings in Calcium Looping Reactors

4Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Nanosilica coatings are considered a simple physical treatment to alleviate the effect of cohesion on powder flowability. In limestone powders, these coatings buffer the rise in cohesion at high temperatures. Here, we investigate the role of particle size in the efficiency (and resilience) of these layers. To this end, this work examines a series of four limestone powders with very sharp particle size distributions: average particle size ranged from 15 to 60 μm. All the samples were treated with nanosilica at different concentrations from 0 to 0.82 wt %. Powders were subjected to short- and long-term storage conditions in calcium looping based systems: temperatures that vary from 25 to 500 °C and moderate consolidations (up to 2 kPa). Experiments monitored powder cohesion and its ability to flow by tracking the tensile strength of different samples while fluidized freely. Fluidization profiles were also used to infer variation in packings and the internal friction of the powder bed. Interestingly, for particle sizes below 50 μm, the nanosilica treatment mitigated cohesion significantly─the more nanosilica content, the better the flowability performance. However, at high temperatures, the efficiency of nanosilica coatings declined in 60 μm samples. Scanning electron microscopy images confirmed that only 60 μm samples presented surfaces barely coated after the experiments. In conclusion, nanosilica coatings on limestone are not stable beyond the 50 μm threshold. This is a critical finding for thermochemical systems based on the calcium looping process, since larger particles can still exhibit a significant degree of cohesion at high temperatures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Durán-Olivencia, F. J., Gannoun, R., Pérez, A. T., & Valverde, J. M. (2023). Efficacy of Nanosilica Coatings in Calcium Looping Reactors. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 62(3), 1373–1389. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.2c03490

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free