Benefits of local tumor excision and pharyngectomy on the survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: A retrospective observational study based on SEER database

14Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: There is ongoing debate about surgery of primary site in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Methods: 3919 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma identified in the SEER registry between 2004 and 2013. The benefit of surgery of primary nasopharynx tumor site on overall and cancer-specific survival was assessed by risk-adjusted multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression and propensity score matching modeling. Results: Surgery was marginally associated with better overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.816, 95% CI 0.656-1.015, p = 0.07) and cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.749, 95% CI 0.552-1.018, p = 0.06) in the propensity score model. Among 398 cases who underwent primary site surgery, 282 (70.85%) received local tumor excision and 79 (20.31%) received pharyngectomy. Local tumor excision and pharyngectomy had almost the same effect on survival in propensity score matching analysis. The benefit was significant in subgroups of white, age <60 year, and patients with T3, N1, M0, AJCC stage III, or moderately differentiated tumors. Further survival analysis showed surgery to promote survival in both radiotherapy and non-radiotherapy patients. Conclusion: This is the first population-based analysis using propensity score model to provide evidence of a positive impact of surgery on survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Moreover, surgery demonstrated the significant benefit in subgroups of patients with specific clinical characteristics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sun, J., Huang, Z., Hu, Z., & Sun, R. (2017). Benefits of local tumor excision and pharyngectomy on the survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: A retrospective observational study based on SEER database. Journal of Translational Medicine, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-017-1204-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free