In-person and telemedicine course models for disaster preparedness: A comparative analysis

5Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: to compare the students’ performance in face-to-face and telemedicine courses for the training and necessary action in disasters, using telemedicine as an effective training tool. Methods: online research conducted after the end of the course of preparation in disasters, carried out in-person, as well as by videoconference. We compared the performance of students in the in-person course and through telemedicine. Results: in the comparison of the results obtained with the pre- and post-test data between the students who attended via telemedicine and in-person, we observed that in the two modalities there was an increase in knowledge (p<0.001). We also observed no statistically significant differences in the posterior evaluation between the in-person and telemedicine courses (p=1.0), however, there was a significant difference at the pre-test evaluative moment (p<0.001). Conclusion: videoconferencing can be effectively used to train health professionals in disaster management, being able to provide adequate knowledge and become an important tool to distance reaching in continuing education.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dorigatti, A. E., Pereira, B. M. T., Simões, R. L., Matsuguma, J. R., Calderan, T. R. A., & Fraga, G. P. (2018). In-person and telemedicine course models for disaster preparedness: A comparative analysis. Revista Do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes, 45(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20181710

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free