Validation of MIPAS IMK/IAA methane profiles

20Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) is an infrared (IR) limb emission spectrometer on the Envisat platform. It measures trace gas distributions during day and night, pole-to-pole, over an altitude range from 6 to 70 km in nominal mode and up to 170 km in special modes, depending on the measurement mode, producing more than 1000 profiles day-1. We present the results of a validation study of methane, version V5R-CH4-222, retrieved with the IMK/IAA (Institut für Meteorologie und Klimaforschung, Karlsruhe/Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia, Grenada) MIPAS scientific level 2 processor. The level 1 spectra are provided by the ESA (European Space Agency) and version 5 was used. The time period covered is 2005-2012, which corresponds to the period when MIPAS measured trace gas distributions at a reduced spectral resolution of 0.0625 cm-1. The comparison with satellite instruments includes the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS), the HALogen Occultation Experiment (HALOE), the Solar Occultation For Ice Experiment (SOFIE) and the SCanning Imaging Absorption spectroMeter for Atmospheric CHartographY (SCIAMACHY). Furthermore, comparisons with MkIV balloon-borne solar occultation measurements and with air sampling measurements performed by the University of Frankfurt are presented. The validation activities include bias determination, assessment of stability, precision validation, analysis of histograms and comparison of corresponding climatologies. Above 50 km altitude, MIPAS methane mixing ratios agree within 3 % with ACE-FTS and SOFIE. Between 30 and 40 km an agreement within 3 % with SCIAMACHY has been found. In the middle stratosphere, there is no clear indication of a MIPAS bias since comparisons with various instruments contradict each other. In the lower stratosphere (below 25 km) MIPAS CH4 is biased high with respect to satellite instruments, and the most likely estimate of this bias is 14 %. However, in the comparison with CH4 data obtained from cryogenic whole-air sampler (cryosampler) measurements, there is no evidence of a high bias in MIPAS between 20 and 25 km altitude. Precision validation is performed on collocated MIPAS-MIPAS pairs and suggests a slight underestimation of its uncertainties by a factor of 1.2. No significant evidence of an instrumental drift has been found.

Figures

  • Table 1. Optical path differences and spectral resolutions of MIPAS measurements.
  • Figure 1. Temporal evolution of latitudinal distribution of CH4 vmrs at 12 km as seen by MIPAS.
  • Figure 2. Vertical resolution of CH4 profiles along one orbit. The oscillation nature of the altitude resolution is caused by the fact that the altitude resolution is better at a tangent altitude than between two adjacent tangent altitudes.
  • Table 2. Reference data sets.
  • Figure 3. Monthly latitudinal distributions of collocated measurements of MIPAS with reference instruments, in percent.
  • Figure 4. Bias estimation of MIPAS methane retrievals with respect to satellite reference instruments. The quantity shown is the mean estimate over all latitudes of MIPAS−REFREF × 100 %.
  • Figure 5. MkIV profiles and MIPAS CH4 vmr vertical profiles – collocated profiles when they exist, otherwise mean profiles in September 2007 and September of 2005–2011 in the 30◦–40◦ N latitude band where the three balloon flights took place.
  • Figure 6. Four cryosampler profiles and MIPAS CH4 vmr profiles – collocated, monthly and seasonal means in corresponding latitude bands. JJA stands for June–July–August; MAM stands for March– April–May.

References Powered by Scopus

Observational constraints on recent increases in the atmospheric CH <inf>4</inf> burden

480Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

MIPAS: An instrument for atmospheric and climate research

466Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Seasonal cycles and QBO variations in stratospheric CH<inf>4</inf> and H<inf>2</inf>O observed in UARS HALOE data

268Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Validation practices for satellite-based Earth observation data across communities

156Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reviews and syntheses: Systematic Earth observations for use in terrestrial carbon cycle data assimilation systems

58Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global satellite observations of column-averaged carbon dioxide and methane: The GHG-CCI XCO<inf>2</inf> and XCH<inf>4</inf> CRDP3 data set

56Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Laeng, A., Plieninger, J., Von Clarmann, T., Grabowski, U., Stiller, G., Eckert, E., … Walker, K. (2015). Validation of MIPAS IMK/IAA methane profiles. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 8(12), 5251–5261. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-5251-2015

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘2202468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 7

64%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 5

45%

Environmental Science 3

27%

Physics and Astronomy 2

18%

Computer Science 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0