Improving Stroke Trace Classification Explainability Through Counterexamples

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Deep learning process trace classification is proving powerful in several application domains, including medical ones; however, classification results are typically not explainable, an issue which is particularly relevant in medicine. In our recent work we tackled this problem, by proposing trace saliency maps, a novel tool able to highlight what trace activities are particularly significant for the classification task. A trace saliency map is built by generating artificial perturbations of the trace at hand that are classified in the same class as the original one, called examples. In this paper, we investigate the role of counterexamples (i.e., artificial perturbations that are classified in a different class with respect to the original trace) in refining trace saliency map information, thus improving explainability. We test the approach in the domain of stroke.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leonardi, G., Montani, S., & Striani, M. (2023). Improving Stroke Trace Classification Explainability Through Counterexamples. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 13897 LNAI, pp. 125–129). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34344-5_16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free