Remote Academic Platforms in Times of a Pandemic

56Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The pandemic has accelerated the use and development of video conferencing platforms due to COVID-19, and it is necessary to find an application that best suits our requirements. This article evaluates nine features of nine video conferencing applications to find the best choice. A detailed analysis has been conducted in this article using surveys to collect data from two samples at national and international level. The methodology followed is the CDIO methodology, a tool to address complex problems in four stages: conception, design, implementation, and operation. The primary aim of this paper is to examine which is the best livestreaming option according to the selected criteria, using, as references, well-known applications such as Jitsi, Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Big Blue Button, among others. An application of multicriteria analysis is also shown to support the evaluation of these platforms compared to the established criteria.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

63Citations
157Readers

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

García, N. O., Velásquez, M. F. D., Romero, C. A. T., Ortiz, J. H., & Khalaf, O. I. (2021). Remote Academic Platforms in Times of a Pandemic. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(21), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i21.25377

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

64%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

20%

Researcher 3

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Linguistics 6

33%

Computer Science 4

22%

Engineering 4

22%

Arts and Humanities 4

22%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0