Rationality and foolishness: Alternative forecasting systems in a manufacturing firm

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Forecasters in firms are expected to employ mathematical techniques encoded in information systems in order to predict the future demand for a firm(s goods. In practice, many forecasters have eschewed statistical methods of fore casting and depend instead on human expertise. This resistance to the ideals and technologies of forecasting has largely been understood in the literature as a failure of rationality in firms. This paper provides a social and political analysis of forecasting in a case study firm, and examines alternative rationalities present in the firm that legitimate what appears to the forecasting literature as foolish practices. The case study organization, a large manufacturing firm, undertook a process of reform of the forecasting process during the course of the study. This paper explores how resistance to a new forecasting support system was shaped by the local equilibrium that had been reached between rationalities in the firm. © 2011 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brown, C. (2011). Rationality and foolishness: Alternative forecasting systems in a manufacturing firm. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 356 AICT, pp. 77–92). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21364-9_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free