Impact of Exam-Oriented Education System on Undergraduate Students’ Cognitive, Affective and Psychomotor Competencies

  • Yasmin F
  • Muhammad Umar Farooq
  • Syed Kazim Shah
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There is a growing concern regarding learners' incompetencies due to the prevalent exam-oriented education systems in many countries worldwide. This quantitative research aimed to investigate the influence of exam-oriented education on students' cognitive, affective, and psychomotor competencies. The study employed Bloom's theoretical framework, based on the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains. A survey questionnaire was administered to a sample of 200 BS English students from a private sector university in Pakistan to collect data on the perceived impact of exam-oriented education on their competencies in the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains. The results revealed that exam-oriented education negatively affected students' competencies across all three domains. Specifically, in the cognitive domain, the participant students reported a lower ability to think critically, creatively, and analytically. In the affective domain, students reported lower emotional intelligence and motivation to learn. Lastly, in the psychomotor domain, students reported a reduced ability to demonstrate and apply practical knowledge. This study emphasized the need to reassess the effectiveness of exam-oriented education systems to develop alternative approaches that could promote a more holistic development of undergraduate students' competencies. The findings have important implications for policymakers, educators, and practitioners involved in designing and implementing educational policies and practices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yasmin, F., Muhammad Umar Farooq, & Syed Kazim Shah. (2023). Impact of Exam-Oriented Education System on Undergraduate Students’ Cognitive, Affective and Psychomotor Competencies. International Journal of Linguistics and Culture, 4(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.52700/ijlc.v4i1.180

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free