Query answering in Datalog+/- ontologies under group preferences and probabilistic uncertainty

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In the recent years, the Web has been changing more and more towards the so-called Social Semantic Web. Rather than being based on the link structure between Web pages, the ranking of search results in the Social Semantic Web needs to be based on something new. We believe that it can be based on user preferences and underlying ontological knowledge. Modeling uncertainty is also playing an increasingly important role in these domains, since uncertainty can arise due to many uncontrollable factors. In this paper, we thus propose an extension of the Datalog+/- ontology language with a model for representing preferences of groups of users and a model for representing the (probabilistic) uncertainty in the domain. Assuming that more probable answers are more preferable, this raises the question how to rank query results, since the preferences of single users may be in conflict with the probability-based preferences and also with each other. We thus propose preference merging and aggregation operators, respectively, and study their semantic and computational properties. Based on these operators, we provide algorithms for answering k -rank queries for DAQs (disjunctions of atomic queries), which generalize top-k queries based on the iterative computation of classical skyline answers, and show that, under certain reasonable conditions, they run in polynomial time in the data complexity. © Springer International Publishing 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lukasiewicz, T., Martinez, M. V., Simari, G. I., & Tifrea-Marciuska, O. (2013). Query answering in Datalog+/- ontologies under group preferences and probabilistic uncertainty. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 8295 LNCS, pp. 192–206). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04244-2_18

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free