Scientific Objectivity: How is it Possible?

  • Lozev K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The paper discusses the topic of scientific objectivity and how it can be achieved by revealing the views of both leading 20-th century thinkers-Max Weber and Sir Karl Popper. Weber's conception of 'value-free science' is discussed in the first part of the paper. My argument here is put forward according to which the conditions in Germany after WWI and the tendency to politicization of the 'German science' served as one of the reasons why Weber concerned himself with investigating scientific objectivity, both in scientific research and in teaching science in universities. The second part reveals Karl Popper's ideas on the topic of objectivity in science with special emphasis on scientific criticism and rational discussion as the basis of Popper's solution of the problem. Comparisons between the 'Weberian' and the 'Popperian' conceptions of scientific objectivity are drawn.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lozev, K. (2017). Scientific Objectivity: How is it Possible? Open Journal for Studies in Philosophy, 1(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojsp.0101.01001l

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free