Organizing Suggestions in Autocompletion Interfaces

5Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We describe two user studies that investigate organization strategies of autocompletion in a known-item search task: searching for terms taken from a thesaurus. In Study 1, we explored ways of grouping term suggestions from two different thesauri (TGN and WordNet) and found that different thesauri may require different organization strategies. Users found Group organization more appropriate for location names from TGN, while Alphabetical works better for object names from WordNet. In Study 2, we compared three different organization strategies (Alphabetical, Group and Composite) for location name search tasks. The results indicate that for TGN autocompletion interfaces help improve the quality of keywords, Group and Composite organization help users search faster, and is perceived easier to understand and to use than Alphabetical. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Amin, A., Hildebrand, M., Ossenbruggen, J. V., Evers, V., & Hardman, L. (2009). Organizing Suggestions in Autocompletion Interfaces. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5478 LNCS, pp. 538–545). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00958-7_46

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free