Initial process of continuous dynamic recrystallization in a superplastic Al-Mg-Mn alloy

7Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Microstructural evolution during region III deformation (T=723 K, ϵ=10-1 s-1) in a superplastic Al-Mg-Mn alloy (ALNOVI-U) was investigated. Surface makers drawn by focused ion beams (FIB) and internal observation by the electron back-scattered diffraction (EBSD) method were used for surface studies and internal studies, respectively. The surface markers clarified that both grain boundary sliding and dislocation activity significantly contributed for deformation. In the EBSD studies, formation of new low-angle boundaries (LABs) was observed at core/mantle boundaries and in core regions. The new LABs were formed by dynamic recovery of dislocation walls; it is the initial process of continuous dynamic recrystallization in region III superplasticity.

References Powered by Scopus

Grain-boundary sliding and its accommodation during creep and superplasticity

628Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A unified approach to grain boundary sliding in creep and superplasticity

561Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Superplasticity in the Aluminium–Zinc Eutectoid

547Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Diffusional and dislocation accommodation mechanisms in superplastic materials

113Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dynamic anisotropic grain growth during superplasticity in Al–Mg–Mn alloy

55Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

EBSD study of superplasticity: New insight into a well-known phenomenon

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kanazawa, T., Masuda, H., Tobe, H., Kakehi, K., & Sato, E. (2017). Initial process of continuous dynamic recrystallization in a superplastic Al-Mg-Mn alloy. Keikinzoku/Journal of Japan Institute of Light Metals, 67(4), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.2464/jilm.67.95

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘21‘2300.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

50%

Researcher 2

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Materials Science 3

75%

Engineering 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0