Predicting survival after curative colectomy for cancer: Individualizing colon cancer staging

138Citations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: Cancer staging determines extent of disease, facilitating prognostication and treatment decision making. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM classification system is the most commonly used staging algorithm for colon cancer, categorizing patients on the basis of only these three variables (tumor, node, and metastasis). The purpose of this study was to extend the seventh edition of the AJCC staging system for colon cancer to incorporate additional information available from tumor registries, thereby improving prognostic accuracy. Methods: Records from 128,853 patients with primary colon cancer reported to the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program from 1994 to 2005 were used to construct and validate three survival models for patients with primary curative-intent surgery. Independent training/test data sets were used to develop and test alternative models. The seventh edition TNM staging system was compared with models supplementing TNM staging with additional demographic and tumor variables available from the registry by calculating a concordance index, performing calibration, and identifying the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: Inclusion of additional registry covariates improved prognostic estimates. The concordance index rose from 0.60 (95% CI, 0.59 to 0.61) for the AJCC model, with T- and N-stage variables, to 0.68 (95% CI, 0.67 to 0.68) for the model including tumor grade, number of collected metastatic lymph nodes, age, and sex. ROC curves for the extended model had higher sensitivity, at all values of specificity, than the TNM system; calibration curves indicated no deviation from the reference line. Conclusion: Prognostic models incorporating readily available data elements outperform the current AJCC system. These models can assist in personalizing treatment and follow-up for patients with colon cancer. © 2011 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

References Powered by Scopus

The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve

17820Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multivariable prognostic models: Issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors

8081Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer

3323Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Nomograms in oncology: More than meets the eye

2327Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gene Expression Classification of Colon Cancer into Molecular Subtypes: Characterization, Validation, and Prognostic Value

1074Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The American society of colon and rectal surgeons clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of colon cancer

240Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weiser, M. R., Gon̈en, M., Chou, J. F., Kattan, M. W., & Schrag, D. (2011). Predicting survival after curative colectomy for cancer: Individualizing colon cancer staging. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(36), 4796–4802. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.36.5080

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 36

59%

Professor / Associate Prof. 15

25%

Researcher 9

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 42

75%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7

13%

Mathematics 4

7%

Computer Science 3

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0