Citation relationships among international mass communication journals

4Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A citation analysis of selected mass communication jour nals using clustering and multidimensional scaling tech niques was performed to determine relationships among international journals in this developing field. Results of the analysis confirm that US journals are currently at the center of the field. The field seems to be heavily described by two dimensions: geography and theory/research. The geograph ical dimension was defined by US journals, European jour nals and others. The theory/research dimension follows a basic critical-empirical dichotomy evident in the literature. The study findings also corroborate current theories of scholarly community development. © 1995, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Networks of scientific papers

2313Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interpersonal Versus Mass Media Communication A False Dichotomy

134Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Citation Networks of Communication Journals, 1977–1985 Cliques and Positions, Citations Made and Citations Received

117Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A science mapping analysis of 'Communication' WoS subject category (1980-2013)

111Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The impact of scientific journals of communication: Comparing google scholar metrics, web of science and scopus

92Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A user term visualization analysis based on a social question and answer log

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hakanen, E. A., & Wolfram, D. (1995). Citation relationships among international mass communication journals. Journal of Information Science, 21(3), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555159502100306

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

63%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

38%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 4

50%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

25%

Chemical Engineering 1

13%

Social Sciences 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free