Effectiveness of Five Vision-Lighting Sources on Photo-Regulation of 22 Species of Ornamental Plants1

  • Cathey H
  • Campbell L
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

When compared at a level of 1 ft-c for 16 hours at a night temperature of 20°C, light from 5 types of sources delayed flowering of short-day plants ( Chrysanthemum , marigold, Rieger begonia), promoted vegetative growth of 2 species of Ulmus , 2 each of Acer , and 1 of Koelreuteria, Rhododendron, Rhus , and Zelkova , and promoted flowering of long-day plants (carnation, marguerite daisy, Petunia) in the order from most to least effective: incandescent (INC) > high-pressure sodium (HPS) > > metal halide (MH) = cool white fluorescent (F) > > clear mercury (Hg). Poinsettia, Betula, Catalpa, Platanus, and Tilia continued to grow vegetatively in response to all sources. Ilex and 2 species of Pinus did not respond. Foot candles of light from HPS lamps had to be increased at least 4- to 8-fold to regulate vegetative growth of long-day plants and delay flowering of short-day plants in comparison to INC lamps. High-pressure sodium lamps were ineffective in promoting early flowering of long-day plants, regardless of intensity or duration.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cathey, H. M., & Campbell, L. E. (2022). Effectiveness of Five Vision-Lighting Sources on Photo-Regulation of 22 Species of Ornamental Plants1. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 100(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.21273/jashs.100.1.65

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free