Why the Easterlin paradox? The Scitovsky hypothesis

3Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Starting from the mid-1970s and the mid-1990s, Richard Easterlin has provided three key contributions to the development of Happiness Economics. These regard: the existence of the paradox that takes his name, its explanation, and the use of psychological concepts in economics, like happiness and aspirations. Each of these issues is still unresolved. Tibor Scitovsky, working in the same years on the same issues, advanced an explanation of the paradox that endogenizes what are today the most widespread explanations, i.e. those based on adaptation and relative income. Confirmation of his hypothesis can be found in psychology and in economics that now use psychological concepts, like motivations and non-cognitive skills.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pugno, M. (2019). Why the Easterlin paradox? The Scitovsky hypothesis. In The Economics of Happiness: How the Easterlin Paradox Transformed Our Understanding of Well-Being and Progress (pp. 157–170). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15835-4_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free