Comparison between sevoflurane and halothane for paediatric ambulatory anaesthesia

148Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We have compared the rapidity and quality of recovery after sevoflurane anaesthesia with those after halothane anaesthesia. Thirty unpremedi-cated paediatric outpatients undergoing pulsed-dye laser therapy for port-wine stains were allocated randomly to receive either halothane or sevoflurane anaesthesia. Each group received 60%nitrous oxide and 1.0-1.5 MAC of volatile agent in oxygen for approximately 40 min. Patients receiving sevoflurane exhibited more rapid emergence and a significantly shorter postoperative recovery time compared with those receiving halothane. No major adverse effects were encountered in each group. These results suggest that sevoflurane anaesthesia is preferable to halothane anaesthesia for paediatric ambulatory patients. © 1991 British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Naito, Y., Tamai, S., Shingu, K., Fujimori, R., & Mori, K. (1991). Comparison between sevoflurane and halothane for paediatric ambulatory anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 67(4), 387–389. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/67.4.387

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free