Bohr's Principle of Complementarity is controversial and there has been much dispute over its precise meaning. Here, without trying to provide a detailed exegesis of Bohr's ideas, we take a very plausible interpretation of what may be understood by a theory which encompasses complementarity in a definite sense, which we term C-theories. The underlying logic of such theories is a kind of logic which has been termed ‘paraclassical’, obtained from classical logic by a suitable modification of the notion of deduction. Roughly speaking, C-theories are non-trivial theories which may have ‘physically’ incompatible theorems (and, in particular, contradictory theorems). So, their underlying logic is a kind of paraconsistent logic.
CITATION STYLE
Costa, N. C. A. D., & Krause, Déc. (2009). Complementarity and Paraconsistency. In Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science (pp. 557–568). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2808-3_25
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.