Hybrid Governance, Strategic Communication and the Quest for Institutional Legitimacy

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter seeks to understand how formal and informal leaders forge alliances in democratisation conflicts. It compares case studies from Serbia, Kenya and South Africa—three countries that have recently experienced democratic transitions. Drawing on the concepts of hybrid political arrangements and strategic communication, it unpacks the role of the media in crafting and conveying narratives that bestows legitimacy to some actors through the (re)framing of the past. In doing so, it argues that, far from being observers of the conflict, the media are active participants, shaping other actors’ strategies and contributing to advance some narratives. It also suggests that there is a lurking risk that the state could slide back into authoritarianism or be hollowed out and captured by undemocratic forces.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Iazzolino, G., & Stremlau, N. (2019). Hybrid Governance, Strategic Communication and the Quest for Institutional Legitimacy. In Media, Communication and the Struggle for Democratic Change: Case Studies on Contested Transitions (pp. 185–204). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16748-6_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free