Evaluating tissue contrast and detecting white matter injury in the infant brain: A comparison study of synthetic phase-sensitive inversion recovery

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Synthetic MR imaging enables the acquisition of phase-sensitive inversion recovery images. The aim of this study was to compare the image quality of synthetic phase-sensitive inversion recovery with that of other sequences in infants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Brain MR imaging with 3D T1-weighted fast-spoiled gradient recalled, synthetic T1WI, and synthetic phasesensitive inversion recovery of 91 infants was compared. Contrast between unmyelinated WM and myelinated WM and between unmyelinated WM and cortical GM was calculated. Qualitative evaluation of image quality and myelination degree was performed. In infants with punctate white matter injuries, the number of lesions was compared. RESULTS: The contrast between unmyelinated WM and myelinated WM was higher in synthetic phase-sensitive inversion recovery compared with fast-spoiled gradient recalled or synthetic T1WI (P < .001). Compared with synthetic T1WI, synthetic phase-sensitive inversion recovery showed higher gray-white matter differentiation (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, D. Y., Jung, W. S., Choi, J. W., Choung, J., & Kim, H. G. (2019). Evaluating tissue contrast and detecting white matter injury in the infant brain: A comparison study of synthetic phase-sensitive inversion recovery. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 40(8), 1406–1412. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6135

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free