No renal toxicity after repeated treatment with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with unresectable peritoneal metastasis

15Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/Aim: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a recent approach for intraperitoneal chemotherapy with promising results for patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM). The aim of this study was to report renal toxicity for patients who received at least 3 repeated PIPAC procedures. Patients and Methods: All patients who underwent at least 3 PIPAC cycles of cisplatin (7.5 mg/m2) and doxorubicin (1.5 mg/m2) for unresectable PM from December 2015 to September 2017, were analysed regarding postoperative renal toxicity. Results: Among 103 patients registered in a prospective single center database, 43 patients underwent at least 3 PIPAC cycles representing a total of 175 PIPAC. Median age was 59.8 years, 24 (55.8%) patients were female and median BMI was 22.2 kg/m2. Most common origins of PM were gastric 22 (51.1%) and ovarian 11 (25.6%) cancer. Median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 17 (range=5-39). For 39 (90.1%) patients, systemic chemotherapy was performed in addition to PIPAC. Forty-three (100%), 17 (39.5%), 14 (32.5%), 8 (18.6%), 3 (7%), 2 (4.7%) and 2 (4.7%) patients underwent three, four, five, six, seven, eight and nine PIPAC procedures, respectively. Repeated PIPAC did not induce significant acute nor cumulative renal toxicity in any patients. Conclusion: Repeated PIPAC did not induce clinically relevant renal toxicity. This study confirms the previous published results in a larger group of patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Larbre, V., Alyami, M., Mercier, F., Vantard, N., Bonnefoy, I., Opsomer, M. A., … Kepenekian, V. (2018). No renal toxicity after repeated treatment with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with unresectable peritoneal metastasis. Anticancer Research, 38(12), 6869–6875. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.13062

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free