Variables affecting peri-implant radiographic bone loss-8-23 years follow-up

4Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate factors associated with long-term peri-implant bone-loss and to create a statistical model explaining bone-loss. The dental records in a private periodontal practice were screened for implant-patients with a minimal follow-up period of 8 years with periapical radiographs at implant-placement (T0) and last follow-up (Tf). Collected data included demographics, general health, medications, periodontal parameters, implant parameters, bone augmentation procedures, restoration and antagonist data, number of supportive periodontal appointments (SPT), and radiographic bone-loss between T0 and Tf. Bivariate and Mixed Logistic Regression analyses were performed. “Goodness-of-fit” of the model was elaborated with Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC) analyses. Thirty-seven patients receiving 142 implants were included. Mean clinical follow-up period was 11.7 ± 3.7 years (range 8–23). Most implants 64.4% were SPT-maintained more than twice a year. Patients with osteoporosis and smokers were prone to increased radiographic peri-implant bone-loss. External-hex implants placed without guided bone regeneration (GBR) and implants 10–12 mm long and diameter of 3.7–4 mm showed less peri-implant bone-loss. The model’s Area Under the Curve (AUC) was 76.9% (Standard Error 4.6%, CI 67.8–86%).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saminsky, M., Dor, A. B., & Horwitz, J. (2020). Variables affecting peri-implant radiographic bone loss-8-23 years follow-up. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 10(23), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10238591

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free