The electromechanical effects of pacing at different sites within the right atrium

9Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims. To compare high right atrium (HRA) with right atrial Methods. Eleven patients undergoing elective electrophysiological studies were studied in order directly to compare atrial conduction acutely associated with HRA and RAA pacing. Twenty-five patients with chronically implanted, active fixation leads in the HRA were compared with an age and sex matched group of 25 patients with chronically implanted, passive fixation leads in the RAA. For both studies recordings were taken in sinus rhythm then repeated when paced. Measured time intervals were intra- and interatrial activation times, P wave duration and time to onset of atrial systolic blood flow. Results. Right atrial pacing, when compared with sinus rhythm, significantly prolongs the interatrial activation time, the P wave duration and the time to onset of right and left atrial blood flow irrespective of site paced. Comparing the RAA group with the HRA group, Conclusion. High right atrial free wall or the right atrial appendage pacing, when compared with sinus rhythm, is significantly detrimental to atrial electromechanical function. There is, however, no demonstrable difference between the two sites. © 2002 The European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Belham, M. R. D., Gill, J., Gammage, M. D., & Holt, P. M. (2002). The electromechanical effects of pacing at different sites within the right atrium. Europace, 4(4), 431–437. https://doi.org/10.1053/eupc.2002.0256

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free