Evaluating Realized Volatility Models with Higher Order Cumulants: HAR-RV Versus ARIMA-RV

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to introduce a new Realized Volatility (RV) Model. The model solves the problems of capturing long memory and heavy tales, which persist in current Heterogeneous Auto Regressive Realized Volatility Models (HAR-RV). First, an extensive empirical analysis of the classical RV model is provided by coupling Digital Signal Processing (DSP), Non Gaussian Time Series Analyses (NG-TSA) and volatility forecasting concepts. All models are built and tested on 30 min quotations of closing spot prices: USD/JPY, CHF/USD, JPY/EUR USD/GBP and GBP/EUR for the period from May 14, 2013 to July 31, 2015, taken from Bloomberg. The independence of the model’s innovations is tested by using the second, third and fourth cumulants, known as Higher Order Cumulants (HOC).Two tests are used, the Box-Ljung (B-Lj) test and Hinich test. The model is compared with the more natural Autoregressive Moving Average model (ARMA-RV). The empirical analysis shows that neither classic HAR-RV nor ARMA-RV models produce independent residuals. In addition, DSP recent findings are used to build a new HOC-ARMA-RV model. It was shown that only HOC-ARMA model fully captures fat tails and the long memory of FX returns.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dudukovic, S. (2019). Evaluating Realized Volatility Models with Higher Order Cumulants: HAR-RV Versus ARIMA-RV. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, 10(2), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11833-4_21

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free