Challenges in co-designing an intervention to increase mobility in older patients: a qualitative study

26Citations
Citations of this article
117Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to explore and discuss key challenges associated with having stakeholders take part in co-designing a health care intervention to increase mobility in older medical patients admitted to two medical departments at two hospitals in Denmark. Design/methodology/approach: The study used a qualitative design to investigate the challenges of co-designing an intervention in five workshops involving health professionals, patients and relatives. “Challenges” are understood as “situations of being faced with something that needs great mental or physical effort in order to be done successfully and therefore tests a person's ability” (Cambridge Dictionary). Thematic content analysis was conducted with a background in the analytical question: “What key challenges arise in the material in relation to the co-design process?”. Findings: Two key challenges were identified: engagement and facilitation. These consisted of five sub-themes: recruiting patients and relatives, involving physicians, adjusting to a new researcher role, utilizing contextual knowledge and handling ethical dilemmas. Research limitations/implications: The population of patients and relatives participating in the workshops was small, which likely affected the co-design process. Practical implications: Researchers who want to use co-design must be prepared for the extra time required and the need for skills concerning engagement, communication, facilitation, negotiation and resolution of conflict. Time is also required for ethical discussions and considerations concerning different types of knowledge creation. Originality/value: Engaging stakeholders in co-design processes is increasingly encouraged. This study documents the key challenges in such processes and reports practical implications.

References Powered by Scopus

Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness

13296Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda.

4572Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: Combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact

2544Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Empowering patients to co-design Covid-19 responses: the role of online health communities

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Patient and public involvement in Nordic healthcare research: a scoping review of contemporary practice

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Research through co-design

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kirk, J., Bandholm, T., Andersen, O., Husted, R. S., Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, T., Nilsen, P., & Pedersen, M. M. (2021). Challenges in co-designing an intervention to increase mobility in older patients: a qualitative study. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 35(9), 140–162. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-02-2020-0049

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 28

56%

Researcher 12

24%

Lecturer / Post doc 8

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 12

33%

Social Sciences 11

31%

Medicine and Dentistry 7

19%

Psychology 6

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0