The hazards of death by smoking in middle-aged women

18Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Recent studies have found that the risk of death continues to increase among female smokers, as compared with women who have never smoked. We wanted to examine the effect of smoking on all-cause and cause-specific mortality and calculate the corresponding population attributable fraction (PAF) of mortality in the Norwegian women and cancer study; a nationally representative prospective cohort study. We followed 85,320 women, aged 31-70 years, who completed a questionnaire in 1991-1997, through linkages to national registries through December 2008. Questionnaire data included information on lifestyle factors, including lifetime history of smoking. Poisson regression models were fitted to estimate relative risks (RRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) adjusting for age, birth cohort, education, postmenopausal status, alcohol consumption and body mass index, all at enrollment. During a mean follow-up time of 14 years 2,842 deaths occurred. Compared with that of never smokers, current smokers had a mortality rate that was double (RR = 2.34; 95 % CI 2.13-2.62) from deaths overall, triple (RR = 3.30; 95 % CI 2.21-4.82) from cerebrovascular disease and myocardial infarction (RR = 3.65; 95 % CI 2.18-6.15), 12 times (RR = 12.16; 95 % CI 7.80-19.00) from lung cancer and seventeen times (RR = 17.00; 95 % CI 5.90-48.78) from chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. The PAF of mortality due to smoking was 34 % (CI 30-39). In summary, one in three deaths among middle aged women in Norway could have been prevented if the women did not smoke. More middle-aged women, than ever before, are dying prematurely due to smoking in Norway. © 2013 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gram, I. T., Sandin, S., Braaten, T., Lund, E., & Weiderpass, E. (2013). The hazards of death by smoking in middle-aged women. European Journal of Epidemiology, 28(10), 799–806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-013-9851-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free