Administration of paracetamol versus dipyrone by intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain relief in children after tonsillectomy

  • Sener M
  • Kocum A
  • Caliskan E
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

© 2013 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Justificativa e objetivo: Métodos: Resultados: Conclusões: Background and objective: We compared the efficacy of intravenous (. IV) paracetamol versus dipyrone via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for postoperative pain relief in children. Methods: The study was composed of 120 children who had undergone elective tonsillectomy after receiving general anesthesia. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the dosage of postoperative intravenous-patient-controlled analgesia: paracetamol, dipyrone, or placebo. Pain was evaluated using a 0- to 100-mm visual analog scale and 1- to 4-pain relief score at 30min, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24h postoperatively. Pethidine (0.25mgkg-1) was administered intravenously to patients requiring rescue analgesia. Pethidine requirements were recorded during the first 24h postoperatively, and treatment related adverse effects were noted. Results: Postoperative visual analog scale scores were significantly lower with paracetamol group compared with placebo group at 6. h (p. . 0.05). Postoperative pethidine requirements were significantly lower with paracetamol and dipyrone groups compared with placebo group (62.5%, 68.4% vs 90%, p.. 0.05). Conclusions: Paracetamol and dipyrone have well tolerability profile and effective analgesic properties when administered IV-PCA for postoperative analgesia in children after tonsillectomy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sener, M., Kocum, A., Caliskan, E., Yilmaz, I., Caylakli, F., & Aribogan, A. (2015). Administration of paracetamol versus dipyrone by intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain relief in children after tonsillectomy. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition), 65(6), 476–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2013.09.010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free