Active case surveillance, passive case surveillance and asymptomatic malaria parasite screening illustrate different Age distribution, spatial clustering and seasonality in western Kenya

35Citations
Citations of this article
104Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Epidemiological characteristics of clinical malaria may differ from asymptomatic infections, thus both cross-sectional parasite screening and longitudinal clinical case surveillance are necessary for malaria transmission monitoring and control. Methods: In order to monitor malaria transmission, surveillance of clinical malaria from two years of active case surveillance in three cohorts of 6,750 individuals, asymptomatic parasitaemia cases of 5,300 individuals and clinical cases in three study areas were carried out in the western Kenyan highlands in 2009 and 2010. Age distribution, seasonality and spatial clustering were analysed. Results: The results revealed a significant difference in the age distribution of clinical cases between passive and active case surveillance, and between clinical case rate and asymptomatic parasite rate. The number of reported cases from health facilities significantly underestimated clinical malaria incidence. The increase in asymptomatic parasite prevalence from low to high transmission seasons was significantly higher for infants (

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhou, G., Afrane, Y. A., Malla, S., Githeko, A. K., & Yan, G. (2015). Active case surveillance, passive case surveillance and asymptomatic malaria parasite screening illustrate different Age distribution, spatial clustering and seasonality in western Kenya. Malaria Journal, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0551-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free