Predicting the effects of proposed Mississippi river diversions on oyster habitat quality; Application of an oyster habitat suitability index model

38Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In an attempt to decelerate the rate of coastal erosion and wetland loss, and protect human communities, the state of Louisiana developed its Comprehensive Master Plan for a Sustainable Coast. The master plan proposes a combination of restoration efforts including shoreline protection, marsh creation, sediment diversions, and ridge, barrier island, and hydrological restoration. Coastal restoration projects, particularly the large-scale diversions of fresh water from the Mississippi River, needed to supply sediment to an eroding coast potentially impact oyster populations and oyster habitat. An oyster habitat suitability index model is presented that evaluates the effects of a proposed sediment and freshwater diversion into Lower Breton Sound. Voluminous freshwater, needed to suspend and broadly distribute river sediment, will push optimal salinities for oysters seaward and beyond many of the existing reefs. Implementation and operation of the Lower Breton Sound diversion structure as proposed would render about 6,173 ha of hard bottom immediately east of the Mississippi River unsuitable for the sustained cultivation of oysters. If historical harvests are to be maintained in this region, a massive and unprecedented effort to relocate private leases and restore oyster bottoms would be required. Habitat suitability index model results indicate that the appropriate location for such efforts are to the east and north of the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Soniat, T. M., Conzelmann, C. P., Byrd, J. D., Roszell, D. P., Bridevaux, J. L., Suir, K. J., & Colley, S. B. (2013). Predicting the effects of proposed Mississippi river diversions on oyster habitat quality; Application of an oyster habitat suitability index model. Journal of Shellfish Research, 32(3), 629–638. https://doi.org/10.2983/035.032.0302

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free