Perspectives on neuroradiology medical expert testimony: Fact and fiction

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There are numerous misconceptions about serving as a medical malpractice expert witness. By maintaining an objective perspective based in the unbiased interpretation of the images provided (for both sides of the conflict), one can best serve society as a whole. Most cases for which a neuroradiology expert is recruited are the following: 1) not with the radiologist as a defendant, 2) resolved without court testimony, and 3) short-lived if frivolous. One can learn much about medicine, our nonradiology colleagues, and the litigation process by participating as an expert witness.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yousem, D. M., Zoarski, G. H., Mark, A. S., & Schwartz, E. S. (2018, December 1). Perspectives on neuroradiology medical expert testimony: Fact and fiction. American Journal of Neuroradiology. American Society of Neuroradiology. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5779

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free