Transabdominal robot-assisted diaphragmatic plication: A 3.5-year experience

16Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Diaphragmatic paralysis, a known cause of dyspnoea, can drastically reduce breathing efficiency, diminishing quality of life. We report our 3.5-year experience with 22 consecutive patients who underwent transabdominal, robot-assisted diaphragmatic plication for diaphragmatic paralysis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 22 consecutive patients who underwent this procedure by a single surgeon from 5 September 2012 to 12 May 2016. The primary outcome measure was change in dyspnoea severity, which was measured with the 5-point Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale (a score of 5 indicates breathlessness so severe, the individual is homebound). RESULTS: Of the 22 patients who underwent robotic diaphragmatic plication, 17 (77.3%) patients were male. Median body mass index was 30 kg/m2 (range 24.2-42.17 kg/m2). Most plications (13 of 22, 59.1%) were left sided; one (4.6%) was bilateral. Median operating time was 161min (range 107-293min), but this time was higher for the first 3 procedures (255 min, range 239-293 min). Median length of stay was 2 days, and median time to chest tube removal was 1 day. At follow-up, 20 of the 22 (91%) patients reported improved breathing and 2 reported no change.No patient reported worsened dyspnoea. The median Medical Research Council score changed from 4.0 preoperatively to 2.0 postoperatively (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Transabdominal robotic diaphragmatic plication involves small incisions but improves surgical dexterity. Surgical times are reasonable, and this surgical technique can be adopted with a quick but steep learning curve. Early results show good functional outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roy, S. B., Haworth, C., Ipsen, T., Kang, P., Hill, D., Do, A., & Kuo, E. (2018). Transabdominal robot-assisted diaphragmatic plication: A 3.5-year experience. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 53(1), 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx255

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free