Comparison of the health status of exclusively breastfeeding infants and newborns receiving sugar water along with breast milk

2Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare newborns fed exclusively on human milk with those fed sugar water along with the mother's milk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study conducted on selected newborns through sampling available at the clinic and neonatal ward and the emergency department of Ghaem Hospital in Mashhad, Iran, during 2014-2018. The data collection tool was a questionnaire developed by researchers that included laboratory data, maternal information, and neonatal characteristics. The data was analyzed with t for Student and c2. RESULTS: Of 445 neonates, 324 (72.8%) were exclusively breastfed, and 121 (27.2%) were fed breast milk along with sugar water. A significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of maternal age (p = 0.001), breastfeeding frequency (p = 0.002), feeding duration (p = 0.013), urination frequency (p = 0.001), weight on admission (p = 0.001), daily weight loss (p = 0.001), daily weight loss percentage (p = 0.001), and serum levels of sodium (p = 0.001), potassium (p = 0.019), urea (p = 0.001), creatinine (p = 0.001), and platelet (p = 0.001). Moreover, lethargy, irritability, mucosal dryness, hyperthermia, apnea, loss of consciousness, mother’s breast problems, and inappropriate breastfeeding position were more common in newborns who were fed sugar water along with breast milk, compared to exclusively breastfed newborns. CONCLUSION: All indications are that nutritional and maternal breast problems, laboratory abnormalities and neonatal complications increased when sugar water was added to human milk.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boskabadi, H., Maamouri, G., Bagheri, F., & Zakerihamidi, M. (2020). Comparison of the health status of exclusively breastfeeding infants and newborns receiving sugar water along with breast milk. Acta Pediatrica de Mexico, 41(5), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.18233/APM41No5pp199-2071692

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free