In recent years, vision has become a major theme in language motivation re-search, capturing a core feature of modern theories of language motivation. However, empir-ical investigations have mostly followed the prototypical design of administering self-report questionnaires and examining correlations among a handful of variables. At the same time, substantial overlap can be found between the current conceptualization of vision theory and the long-standing tradition of goal-setting theory. After demonstrating this substantial over-lap, and taking our cues from goal-setting theory, this paper highlights critical gaps in current research into vision, including its sensory element, characteristics of effective vision, vision evolution over time, vision multiplicity and potential inter-vision conflict, vision mediators, collective vision, and the role of emotions and self-satisfaction at the end. The ultimate aim of this article is to propose a research agenda to examine the extent to which vision can be meaningfully distinguished from goal.
CITATION STYLE
Al-Hoorue, A. H., & Shlowiy, A. A. (2020). Vision theory vs. Goal-setting theory: A critical analysis. Porta Linguarum, 2020(33), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi33.26656
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.