Vision theory vs. Goal-setting theory: A critical analysis

15Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In recent years, vision has become a major theme in language motivation re-search, capturing a core feature of modern theories of language motivation. However, empir-ical investigations have mostly followed the prototypical design of administering self-report questionnaires and examining correlations among a handful of variables. At the same time, substantial overlap can be found between the current conceptualization of vision theory and the long-standing tradition of goal-setting theory. After demonstrating this substantial over-lap, and taking our cues from goal-setting theory, this paper highlights critical gaps in current research into vision, including its sensory element, characteristics of effective vision, vision evolution over time, vision multiplicity and potential inter-vision conflict, vision mediators, collective vision, and the role of emotions and self-satisfaction at the end. The ultimate aim of this article is to propose a research agenda to examine the extent to which vision can be meaningfully distinguished from goal.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al-Hoorue, A. H., & Shlowiy, A. A. (2020). Vision theory vs. Goal-setting theory: A critical analysis. Porta Linguarum, 2020(33), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi33.26656

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free