The Duty of Care of Fossil-Fuel Producers for Climate Change Mitigation

15Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

On 26 May 2021, the District Court of The Hague (The Netherlands) passed an innovative judgment in Milieudefensie v. Royal Dutch Shell. The Court interpreted Shell's duty of care towards the inhabitants of the Netherlands as requiring it to mitigate climate change by reducing the carbon dioxide emissions resulting from its global operations by at least 45% by 2030, compared with 2019. This case comment salutes the identification of a corporate duty of care for climate change mitigation but expresses scepticism regarding the Court's interpretation of this duty. The Court's reading of global climate mitigation objectives and climate science, which form the basis of its determination of Shell's requisite level of mitigation action, is plagued with inconsistencies. It is argued here that, in order to determine the standard of care applicable to Shell, the Court should have relied not only on a 'descending' reasoning as to what ought to be done, but also on an 'ascending' reasoning accounting for industry practices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mayer, B. (2022). The Duty of Care of Fossil-Fuel Producers for Climate Change Mitigation. Transnational Environmental Law, 11(2), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102522000103

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free