Differential-Linear cryptanalysis of ICEPOLE

20Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

ICEPOLE is a CAESAR candidate with the intermediate level of robustness under nonce misuse circumstances in the original document. In particular, it was claimed that key recovery attack against ICEPOLE is impossible in the case of nonce misuse. ICEPOLE is strong against the differential cryptanalysis and linear cryptanalysis. In this paper, we developed the differential-linear attacks against ICEPOLE when nonce is misused. Our attacks show that the state of ICEPOLE–128 and ICEPOLE– 128a can be recovered with data complexity 246 and time complexity 246; the state of ICEPOLE–256a can be recovered with data complexity 260 and time complexity 260 For ICEPOLE–128a and ICEPOLE–256a, the secret key is recovered once the state is recovered. We experimentally verified the attacks against ICEPOLE–128 and ICEPOLE–128a.

References Powered by Scopus

Linear cryptanalysis method for DES cipher

1923Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Differential cryptanalysis of DES-like cryptosystems

1868Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Duplexing the sponge: Single-pass authenticated encryption and other applications

238Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

DLCT: A new tool for differential-linear cryptanalysis

64Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Differential-Linear Cryptanalysis Revisited

56Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Improved differential-linear cryptanalysis of 7-round Chaskey with partitioning

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, T., Tjuawinata, I., & Wu, H. (2015). Differential-Linear cryptanalysis of ICEPOLE. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9054, pp. 243–263). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48116-5_12

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

73%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

8%

Researcher 2

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 21

81%

Physics and Astronomy 2

8%

Mathematics 2

8%

Design 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free