The multi-flow necessary condition for membership in the pedigree polytope is not sufficient - A counterexample

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The multistage insertion formulation (MI) for the symmetric traveling salesman problem (STSP), gives rise to a combinatorial object called pedigree. Pedigrees are in one-to-one correspondence with Hamiltonian cycles. The convex hull of all the pedigrees of a problem instance is called the pedigree polytope. The MI polytope is as tight as the subtour elimination polytope when projected into its two-subscripted variable space. It is known that the complexity of solving a linear optimization problem over a polytope is polynomial if the membership problem of the polytope can be solved in polynomial time. Hence the study of membership problem of the pedigree polytope is important. A polynomially checkable necessary condition is given by Arthanari in [5]. This paper provides a counter example that shows the necessary condition is not sufficient. © 2013 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ardekani, L. H., & Arthanari, T. S. (2013). The multi-flow necessary condition for membership in the pedigree polytope is not sufficient - A counterexample. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7803 LNAI, pp. 409–419). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36543-0_42

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free