Baseline C-reactive protein level as a predictor of mortality in bacteraemia patients: A population-based cohort study

23Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We examined the association between C-reactive protein (CRP) level at time of blood culture (BC) draw and mortality following bacteraemia. Our population-based cohort study comprised all first-time monomicrobial bacteraemia episodes in adults in a Danish county during 1996-2004 (n=5267). CRP was measured within 24h of the first positive BC draw. Cox regression was used to compute mortality rate ratios (MRRs) associated with CRP level quartiles (10-64 (reference), 65-143, 144-240 and 241-688mg/L), controlling for age, gender, comorbidity, specialty, acquisition of infection, and infection focus. We also looked for a biological interaction between CRP level and high magnitude of bacteraemia (three of three culture bottles positive). Thirty-day mortality increased with higher CRP level: adjusted 0-30-day MRRs for patients in the second, third and fourth CRP quartiles were 1.38 (95% CI 1.13-1.69), 1.70 (95% CI 1.40-2.06), and 2.38 (95% CI 1.96-2.87), respectively (p for trend <10-4). In contrast, mortality associations with CRP during 31-365 days of follow-up were weak (adjusted MRRs for the second to fourth quartiles ranged from 1.18 to 1.28). A high magnitude of bacteraemia strengthened the association between high CRP level and 30-day mortality. We conclude that the CRP level, measured concurrently with the first positive BC, independently predicted 30-day mortality in adult bacteraemia patients. © 2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gradel, K. O., Thomsen, R. W., Lundbye-Christensen, S., Nielsen, H., & Schønheyder, H. C. (2011). Baseline C-reactive protein level as a predictor of mortality in bacteraemia patients: A population-based cohort study. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 17(4), 627–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03284.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free