Microscopic versus endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery in the Leiden cohort treated for Cushing's disease: Surgical outcome, mortality, and complications

22Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: First-choice treatment for Cushing's disease is transsphenoidal adenomectomy. Since its introduction in the 1970s, many centers have now switched from microscopic to endoscopic surgery. We compared both techniques for the treatment of Cushing's disease at the Leiden University Medical Center, a European reference center for pituitary diseases. Methods: Cohort study with inclusion and follow-up of consecutive Cushing's disease patients primarily treated by transsphenoidal surgery at the Leiden University Medical Center between 1978 and 2016. We compared remission rates (primary endpoint), mortality, and complications between microscopic (performed up to 2005) and endoscopic (performed from 2003 onwards) surgery. Subgroup analyses were performed by tumor size, surgical experience, and preoperative imaging techniques. Additionally, surgeons' intraoperative findings regarding presence and removal of the adenoma were related to surgical outcome. Results: Of 137 included patients, 87 were treated microscopically and 50 endoscopically. Three months after microscopic surgery, 74 patients (86%) were in remission. Five-year recurrence-free survival was 89% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82-96%), and ten-year recurrence free survival was 84% (95% CI: 75-93%). After endoscopic surgery, 39 patients (83%) were in remission. Both five-year and ten-year recurrence-free survival were 71% (95% CI: 55-87%). Hazard ratio for recurrence was 0.47 (95% CI: 0.19-1.14), and for mortality 2.79 (95% CI: 0.35-22.51), for microscopic versus endoscopic surgery. No learning curve was found for endoscopy, nor an influence of preoperative imaging technique for microscopy. In addition, we did not find a clear relation between the surgeons' intraoperative findings and surgical outcomes. Conclusions: This study did not identify a clear advantage of microscopic or endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for the treatment of Cushing's disease based on clinical outcome. The transition to endoscopic surgery at our center was not accompanied by transient worsening of outcomes, which may be reassuring for those considering transitioning.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Broersen, L. H. A., Van Haalen, F. M., Biermasz, N. R., Lobatto, D. J., Verstegen, M. J. T., Van Furth, W. R., … Pereira, A. M. (2019). Microscopic versus endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery in the Leiden cohort treated for Cushing’s disease: Surgical outcome, mortality, and complications. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-019-1038-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free