Denationalisation, Assassination, Territory: Some (U.S.-Prompted) Reflections

1Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Unlike the several liberal states Macklin cites which have already, or will soon, deploy citizenship revocation as an anti-terrorism mechanism, the United States is unlikely to implement similar policies. The U.S. Constitution has been interpreted to prohibit unilateral citizenship-stripping as a tool of governance. Instead, denationalisation via expatriation in the U.S. requires the individual to specifically consent to relinquish the status, and such consent cannot be inferred from acts alone – even from acts which some (including some commentators in this symposium) would like to characterise as intrinsically antithetical to citizenship identity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bosniak, L. (2018). Denationalisation, Assassination, Territory: Some (U.S.-Prompted) Reflections. In IMISCOE Research Series (pp. 215–218). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92719-0_40

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free