How accurate is brain volumetry?: A methodological evaluation

6Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We evaluate the accuracy and precision of different techniques for measuring brain volumes based on MRI. We compare two established software packages that offer an automated image analysis, EMS and SIENAX, and a third method, which we present. The latter is based on the Interactive Watershed Transform and a model based histogram analysis. All methods are evaluated with respect to noise, image inhomogeneity, and resolution as well as inter-examination and inter-scanner characteristics on 66 phantom and volunteer images. Furthermore, we evaluate the N3 nonuniformity correction for improving robustness and reproducibility. Despite the conceptual similarity of SIENAX and EMS, important differences are revealed. Finally, the volumetric accuracy of the methods is investigated using the ground truth of the Brain Web phantom. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hahn, H. K., Jolly, B., Lee, M., Krastel, D., Rexilius, J., Drexl, J., … Peitgen, H. O. (2004). How accurate is brain volumetry?: A methodological evaluation. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 3216, pp. 335–342). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30135-6_41

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free