Effect of adjunctive pramlintide treatment on treatment satisfaction in patients with type 1 diabetes

43Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE - To assess the effect of adjunctive pramlintide treatment on treatment satisfaction in patients with type 1 diabetes treated with intensive insulin regimens. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Intensively treated (multiple daily injection [MDI] or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII] pump therapy) patients with type 1 diabetes completed a study-specific treatment satisfaction questionnaire following 29 weeks of either placebo (n = 136) or pramlintide (n = 130) treatment in a double-blind, noninferiority pramlintide dose titration trial. End points included patient reported outcomes, their relationship to insulin treatment regimen, A1C, weight, and insulin use. RESULTS - Pramlintide-treated patients reported greater treatment satisfaction in most questionnaire responses. Treatment satisfaction was similar for pramlintide-treated patients regardless of intensive insulin regimens (MDI versus CSII). Mean A1C was reduced to a similar degree in both pramlintide- (-0.39 ± 0.07%) and placebo-treated (-0.45 ± 0.07%) patients. However, pramlintide treatment was associated with reductions in mean body weight (-1.50 ± 0.33 kg; P < 0.0001) and mealtime insulin use (-19.05 ± 5.17%; P < 0.005) over 29 weeks, while placebo treatment resulted in weight gain (1.28 ± 0.25 kg) and a smaller reduction in mealtime insulin use (-2.20 ± 3.33%). CONCLUSIONS - Despite similar reductions in A1C, pramlintide treatment resulted in greater treatment satisfaction compared with placebo treatment. This was independent of insulin delivery method. © 2007 by the American Diabetes Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marrero, D. G., Crean, J., Zhang, B., Kellmeyer, T., Gloster, M., Herrmann, K., … Kolterman, O. (2007). Effect of adjunctive pramlintide treatment on treatment satisfaction in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 30(2), 210–216. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc06-1026

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free