Public attitudes to different possible models of a United Ireland: evidence from a citizens’ assembly in Northern Ireland

12Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We empirically identify the considered views of the Northern Ireland public on the relative merits of two possible models of a united Ireland: an integrated united Ireland in which Northern Ireland is absorbed into an all-island polity, and a united Ireland in which Northern Ireland continues to exist as a devolved entity. We use data from a specially designed one-day citizens’ assembly. We report analyses based on quantitative examination of pre- and post-deliberation surveys and qualitative analysis of the transcripts of participants’ deliberation. We find that, after learning about the different two models, citizens’ support for the devolved model declined, particularly among Protestant participants. We elaborate the implications of our findings for any referendum on the constitutional future of Northern Ireland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Garry, J., O’Leary, B., Coakley, J., Pow, J., & Whitten, L. (2020). Public attitudes to different possible models of a United Ireland: evidence from a citizens’ assembly in Northern Ireland. Irish Political Studies, 35(3), 422–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2020.1816379

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free