How choosing random-walk model and network representation matters for flow-based community detection in hypergraphs

30Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Hypergraphs offer an explicit formalism to describe multibody interactions in complex systems. To connect dynamics and function in systems with these higher-order interactions, network scientists have generalised random-walk models to hypergraphs and studied the multibody effects on flow-based centrality measures. Mapping the large-scale structure of those flows requires effective community detection methods applied to cogent network representations. For different hypergraph data and research questions, which combination of random-walk model and network representation is best? We define unipartite, bipartite, and multilayer network representations of hypergraph flows and explore how they and the underlying random-walk model change the number, size, depth, and overlap of identified multilevel communities. These results help researchers choose the appropriate modelling approach when mapping flows on hypergraphs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eriksson, A., Edler, D., Rojas, A., de Domenico, M., & Rosvall, M. (2021). How choosing random-walk model and network representation matters for flow-based community detection in hypergraphs. Communications Physics, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-021-00634-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free