A modern theodicy: John Rawls and ‘The Law of Peoples’

0Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

John Rawls’ The Law of Peoples has typically been read as an intervention in the field of ‘global justice’. In this paper, I offer a different and widely overlooked interpretation. I argue that The Law of Peoples is a secular theodicy. Rawls wants to show that the 'great evils' of history do not condemn humankind by using a secularised form of moral faith to search for signs that the social world allows for the possibility of perfect justice. There are, I show, striking homologies between this argument and the Christian theodicy that Rawls wrote in 1942, A Brief Inquiry into the Meaning of Sin and Faith. Perhaps more significantly, I draw out how there is, as Rawls himself appears to acknowledge, an intimate relationship between this redemptive project and Rawls' idealistic and moralistic approach to political philosophy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fletcher, L. (2023). A modern theodicy: John Rawls and ‘The Law of Peoples.’ European Journal of Political Theory. https://doi.org/10.1177/14748851231201471

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free