The size of an attentional window affects working memory guidance

19Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We ask whether attentional guidance from working memory (WM) is influenced by the size of an attentional window. Participants adopted either a focused or a diffuse attentional window when responding to a search display. Prior to the search display an initial cue had to be held in memory (Experiment 1A, visual WM; Experiment 1C, verbal WM) or merely identified (Experiment 1B, identification). In all cases, search performance was affected by the representation of the cue in the search display, with the cuing effects (either cost or benefit) being larger when the cue was held in memory than when it was merely identified. Critically, the magnitude of the cuing benefit increased when participants adopted a diffuse attentional window. This held for effects that are based on items held in WM and for effects that are based only on item priming. The results suggest that variations in the size of an attentional window modulate top-down (both WM conditions) as well as bottom-up guidance of attention (identification condition). © 2010 The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hernández, M., Costa, A., & Humphreys, G. W. (2010). The size of an attentional window affects working memory guidance. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 72(4), 963–972. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.4.963

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free