Pepsin and amylase in oral and tracheal secretions: A pilot study

14Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Endotracheal intubation increases the risk for microaspiration of secretions around the tube cuff. Pepsin has been used as a biomarker for gastric aspiration. Amylase is a newer proposed biomarker for aspiration of oral contents. Objective To assess the presence of pepsin and amylase in paired oral-tracheal secretions of adult patients treated with mechanical ventilation. Methods In this descriptive study, paired samples of oral and tracheal secretions were obtained from adult patients at baseline and again within 4 hours when a need for endotracheal suctioning was assessed. Assays of pepsin and amylase were processed in a specialty diagnostic laboratory. Results The sample consisted of 10 men and 3 women with a median age of 56 years. The majority were intubated with a subglottic suction endotracheal tube (9 patients, 69%), receiving synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (10 patients; 77%), and receiving enteral feedings (11 patients; 85%) through a tube distally placed in the stomach (8 patients; 67%). Pepsin was present in oral secretions of 9 patients (69%), and in tracheal specimens of 7 patients (54%) at one or both sampling times. Amylase was detected in all patients' oral secretions and in tracheal secretions of 5 patients (38%) at one or both sampling times. Conclusions Many patients had pepsin, amylase, or both in tracheal aspirates. Pepsin was more commonly detected than was amylase. Although the relationship of this finding to longterm outcomes was not assessed, findings indicate that micro - aspiration of oral and gastric secretions occurs frequently. © 2014 by AACN. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sole, M. L., Conrad, J., Bennett, M., Middleton, A., Hay, K., Ashworth, S., & Mehta, D. I. (2014). Pepsin and amylase in oral and tracheal secretions: A pilot study. American Journal of Critical Care, 23(4), 334–338. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2014292

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free