Criticism of Curriculum Quality Assessment Models: A Narrative Review

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Context: Curricula are the heart of educational centers, and their continuous evaluation and revision are among the necessities of a sustainable and responsive program to respond to the needs of the beneficiaries who use them. Evaluation models are not comprehensive and are associated with shortcomings. The current review has investigated curriculum evaluation models using a narrative approach. In this research, curricula definitions, curriculum elements and components, how to evaluate their usefulness and quality, the necessity of revising and changing if needed, and finally, their criticisms were discussed. Curriculum evaluation models have strengths and weaknesses; however, curriculum evaluation is a necessity for every country due to its importance in improving the level of education and training of specialized human resources. It is suggested to design a new model suitable for the environmental and educational conditions of each country using the existing models.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fard, Z. H., Ghorrabi, A. T., Goharinezhad, S., Asl, I. M. D., & Dahim, A. (2023). Criticism of Curriculum Quality Assessment Models: A Narrative Review. Health Technology Assessment in Action. Tehran University of Medical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/htaa.v7i2.13814

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free