How to form shared objects to enhance university–school collaboration? A cultural–historical activity theory perspective

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: University-school (U–S) collaboration has proven to be an effective approach for teacher professional development, but it could be hampered by the lack of shared objects. To understand how shared objects are formed in U–S collaboration, this research established a university-school collaborated Change Laboratory in W primary school based on cultural-historical activity theory, which is under the background of Chinese teaching research activity. Methods: Recordings of meetings throughout the year were transcribed into texts and coded, and then analyzed via the method of grounded theory and contradiction analysis. Results: The findings reveal that, in comparison to previous studies regarding shared object formation process, this study identified an special phase named “experimental object,” which highlights the significance of experimentation in U–S collaboration. Also, multiple contradictions are recognized as the driving force for shared object formation which would gradually transform into fundamental conflicts between tools. The main contradictions identified include those between scientific and daily concepts, university culture and school culture, as well as new experiment and old routine. Discussion: The current study implicates that U–S collaboration is an expansive learning process to acquire unknown knowledge, which necessitates both parties engaging in exploration and experimentation together. Furthermore, shared object formation within U–S collaboration requires participants to focus on developing teaching tools while consciously undergoing changes in aspects such as logic of thinking, culture and routine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fang, X., Mao, Q., Hong, J. J., & Diao, C. (2024). How to form shared objects to enhance university–school collaboration? A cultural–historical activity theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1307552

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free